<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Presentation about simplicity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://simpletom.co.uk/2009/06/18/presentation-about-simplicity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://simpletom.co.uk/2009/06/18/presentation-about-simplicity/</link>
	<description>Explorations of simplicity and simple living</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 12:00:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: savage77</title>
		<link>http://simpletom.co.uk/2009/06/18/presentation-about-simplicity/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[savage77]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simpletom.co.uk/?p=53#comment-14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Andy, succinctly and eloquently put. 
Here&#039;s an email I received from Giri:

i think the presentation is far too complex. Somebody writing on
simplicity should know one further rule - Brevity.

And also the email from the author of the presentation:

Hi, Tom.

Glad you enjoyed it - the presentation has been picked up all over the world and I&#039;ve had a wonderful response from readers.

The slides are from a workshop I ran at the Usability Professionals&#039; Association conference last week. The audience was made up of people who design technology products - hence the focus on technological examples.

What&#039;s been remarkable and pleasing is the number of people from other fields who&#039;ve written to say the advice applies to what they do, too.

I&#039;ll certainly be publishing something in the future discussing how to design novel solutions that are also simple.

Thanks, again. I&#039;ve bookmarked your blog!

Giles]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Andy, succinctly and eloquently put.<br />
Here&#8217;s an email I received from Giri:</p>
<p>i think the presentation is far too complex. Somebody writing on<br />
simplicity should know one further rule &#8211; Brevity.</p>
<p>And also the email from the author of the presentation:</p>
<p>Hi, Tom.</p>
<p>Glad you enjoyed it &#8211; the presentation has been picked up all over the world and I&#8217;ve had a wonderful response from readers.</p>
<p>The slides are from a workshop I ran at the Usability Professionals&#8217; Association conference last week. The audience was made up of people who design technology products &#8211; hence the focus on technological examples.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s been remarkable and pleasing is the number of people from other fields who&#8217;ve written to say the advice applies to what they do, too.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll certainly be publishing something in the future discussing how to design novel solutions that are also simple.</p>
<p>Thanks, again. I&#8217;ve bookmarked your blog!</p>
<p>Giles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://simpletom.co.uk/2009/06/18/presentation-about-simplicity/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simpletom.co.uk/?p=53#comment-13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice post.

To paraphrase, one way of looking at simplicity is to do pointless things efficiently. A better way might be to do fewer pointless things.

I can think of few approaches to simplicity that start with a 128 page powerpoint presentation.

I can think of a few more that start with a view of the sea.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post.</p>
<p>To paraphrase, one way of looking at simplicity is to do pointless things efficiently. A better way might be to do fewer pointless things.</p>
<p>I can think of few approaches to simplicity that start with a 128 page powerpoint presentation.</p>
<p>I can think of a few more that start with a view of the sea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

